| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
|
@Tifosi Hey no problem,it's what a forum is all about!
 She was rather 'mannequin like' last night and I've no doubt did not want her return to be on a night show.I do find her very beautiful though and would be just as happy if she never did another night show,I'm guessing she won't anyway lol! Eroticism for me is not seeing 'everything' but being given the 'promise' that one day you might see a little more.Kleopatra before she left was doing just the sort of flirty 'girl next door' performance I like and if she gets back to that on the days,starting today hopefully,then I will be happy! It will also help me avoid the camera switching to a naked Jessy every few seconds to!  Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander..
I respect everything you say about her, and we all have our own ideas of how an erotic show should be. For me though, watching Kleopatra is like watching paint dry. There is nothing erotic about her for me, she could be performing in Madam Tussauds. Still, I respect your view, but for me, she should not be on the show, but that's just my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
i wonder what should happens to make change the mind of Kleopatra
i wonder how is it possible that she cames back and just they put her into a night show with the other girls naked all around her. i wonder why the producer of ETV makes these kind of chooses. My only hope is that ther return of Kleopatra doesn't means a return to the last old manners full of censorship... we passed through a 2009 complietly silly about censored things. I relly hope that these 2 things could happens now: possibility 1) Kleopatra begin to understand that she must do something ..at least some serious teasing more sensual and a little bit naked. possibilty 2) Kleopatra is moved only in the moorning or, at least, in the evening shows time, but never in the nights shows. Any other possibilities would means only a step back to a wrong ETV direction. |
|
|
|
|
|
I write what I write as a viewer only.I am in the UK and not even sure I could contribute financially even if I wanted to.There are many,many more girls on the UK channels who would get my money first if I had any!
 ETV is a little something different to watch now and again and when I watch it I like to see beautiful,'unobtainable' girls as I mentioned before.Other 'obtainable' girls who put on a good performance,are good on the Microphone etc. etc. still do not make themselves attractive to me.Girls like Scarlet are what makes this channel good! A very beautiful girl who is brilliant at all aspects of an erotic show.But ETV does not seem to like employing many of these types of girl,even though a continent as big as Europe must have thousands of them.So given the choice of beautiful but idle or not beautiful but putting on a 'good' show,I will take the first option every time.You may find this surprising,but although Kleopatra did almost nothing on her return I was still pleased to see her.I didn't expect 'erotic miracles' from her as this was never going to happen and putting her on the night show was yet another cynical money grabbing attempt by ETV to get more money from their customers.For a Monday,there was lot of nudity from the other girls and no easy way into the show for her unless she did a 'middle ground' performance like Gia usually does and that was not going to happen either.I think she will continue on the day shows from now on if her return is to be a permanent one and I will enjoy watching her there too. Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
I thought Kleopatra had come back to sell the the sofa.
She just looked like a model you see in sofa ads. |
|
|
|
|
|
alex wrote:Agreement, also when I think to be entertaining at the micro isn't important. In the past I would be happy if e.g. Aria or Clio were not so often on the mic... Yes Alex, you are completely right. I absolutely didn't mean Aria's senseless sermons, or Marayah's pathetic invocations, which are irritating. I just mean a girl having a good relationship with the microphone, in order to present the other girls, to thank and to say some nice words in answer to the paying viewers (Evah is a good example). I never heard Kleopatra doing this... |
|
|
|
|
dont worry Silkar, the oportunities are on both parties. Etv pay nothing and Kleo do nothing. Etv is not an "onlus", only profit is in their mind, nothing else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement, also when I think to be entertaining at the micro isn't important. In the past I would be happy if e.g. Aria or Clio were not so often on the mic...
How many languages Cleo speaks, just one? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Come on guys...as you know I have nothing against soft models, but a soft model :
- should be very nice (it's clear...it doesn't mean that 'hot girls' must be 'ugly'...) - should be enterteining at the micro - should be active, even if in a soft way - should speak several languages Kleopatra owns only the first one of these features, so she is not a 'soft model', she is a TUM model (Totally Useless Model). So the only thing that should be 'unobtainable', regarding kleopatra, are our money for her 'nothing'. Her come-back is only a promotion for the 'feet' revival ... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only job which gives opportunity to do nothing and to be payed for that.
|
|
|
|
piggy wrote:is she just came back ? I'm curios, what reason? |
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:I'm just glad she is back!As you said unobtainable in real life for you but unfortunately also on this channel, so what is the difference ? in "fantasy" you want to be in a better position unless you enjoy suffering ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
is she just came back ?
O_O p.s. i have a suspect about the reason of that... |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just glad she is back!
Day or night,clothes on or off! She is a beautiful,'fantasy' girl.A girl you would expect to see on a channel like this.A girl you could call 'unobtainable' in real life.There are too many 'obtainable' girls on this channel already! Dreamlander |
|
|
|
Watcher wrote:luca82 wrote:...and perfect for the day section, no for night. Surely she is more elegant respect Lilian or Jessy, but like I said that some girls aren't adapted for the night for them no beauty in the same time also the girls always dressed aren't adapted for this. |
|
|
|
.