| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
Aida, she never lets you down, a wonderful woman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aida is the cutest model in the channel with nice show. Unfortunately her big mistake the ugly tattoo that she made ! I do not know if she was drunk when she made it. But always nice show from Aida
|
|
|
|
|
Aida was hot last night, I enjoyed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fortunately, Aida is between a free night in the program, and not just private show's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:what the hell has done Aida with that horrible tattoo thing on her neck? which isn't really visible on Hilbert's posted caps of Aida's new collar is that the studio light causes some reflexions on the collar, too. seems like the tattoo phobia is grown up to a tattoo panic.  btw grown up, the "already" 20 years old Aida is grown further four centimeters in the last year (a "little" bit late, or?  ).in 2025 she'll sign her first NBA contract. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks Hilbert, now i feel better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
what the hell has done Aida with that horrible tattoo thing on her neck?
[Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig] why? why Aida? 
|
|
|
|
|
I knew a magician who told me he had an Abba tattoo put on his p---k because he liked their music. His new wife found out on their honymoon it actually read "ABRACADABRA" . Nice trick eh ! Ha ha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tattoo has Aida not smarter or dumber.
She's just AIDA. And you like me still. 
|
|
|
|
|
for once I agree with you well said
|
|
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:bellerophon wrote:The real reason is likely to be peer group pressure - "everybody has a tattoo" - I'd better get one too". Pity. I always had Aida down as one of the more thoughtful and intelligent young girls in an admittedly not very intelligent nor thoughtful cadre. Seems I misjudged her. Of course she can't really see it very well. If there were a law which required tattoos to be where the owner could see them all the time, I'll bet any money there'd be a lot fewer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
bellerophon wrote:The real reason is likely to be peer group pressure - "everybody has a tattoo" - I'd better get one too". Pity. I always had Aida down as one of the more thoughtful and intelligent young girls in an admittedly not very intelligent nor thoughtful cadre. Seems I misjudged her. Of course she can't really see it very well. If there were a law which required tattoos to be where the owner could see them all the time, I'll bet any money there'd be a lot fewer. bellerophon's post just as an example for several posts about tattoos in the last month I'm wondering ... although many of you don't like tattoos are some of you real experts about the best look and correct place for tattoos. that's a strange surprise for me. also the (so far for me unknown) fact that people with tattoos cannot be intelligent and tattoos must be visible mainly for the "owner" of the tattoo. I've though tattoos could be a sign to express or show something to others and so the place for it is chosen. and places for others are often not well visible for the person her-/ himself as we can see e.g. at army signs or sports numbers. I think the thoughts about the place take as much time as the thoughts about the motive. but of course you all know it better. ;)as the 80% isn't result of my own research it's of course a false value. maybe the tattoos that are result of a kind of reflex or drunken night (drunken sailors, drunken army guys or dentists with a Hangover) are often regretted by the owner but I doubt that 80% of the tattoos that are the result of a longtime progress (many persons think years or decades about the right tattoo at the right place) are unwanted within 5 years. especially persons with more than 1 tattoo would spoil that statistic. and of course it's possible to remove or edit tattoos. 63% of the models are inked, .... fine, no problem for me. I'm more unhappy about the no-sports models and sorry, but @etv the no-sports fraction is bigger than the 63% tattoo fraction. and I think that's the same as in most societies in europa. especially for all you guys I've had a look at the young girls last summer and sorry, but many of the young girls are with tattoos nowadays and especially at festivals (away from the business and enjoying the private life) you'll realise that many young women are inked and most of the beauties are inked (my impression, I've deleted all my statistics when I've had more problems to concentrate on numbers with each beer and beautiful girl).in all these discussion I don't find a single post that is about a possible reason or intention of a tattoo and only few comments about quality of a tattoo. of course I don't think that all tatts are great. I didn't like Karry's tatts nor do I like Aida's tatt but reading Lauren's text at reverse cowgirl with slow motions sounds great . and of course I don't need to see another tramp stamp or rose at the shoulder (both are best reasons to switch from doggy to cowgirl) but for me a tatt is part of the person and so the same as hair style or hair colour, finger nails, public hair or whatever. I have a problem with lazy persons, with no-sports persons, with liars, with arseholes and many other persons but a tattoo at someone is for sure no problem for me.it's her/ her decision and not my problem. tattoo or not, I simply don't care about this. it's the person and character I care about.btw: is anyone of you inked? or did anyone of you spend some real time thinking about tatts, except the short thought/ impulse that you don't like tattoos? |
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:one new f___g tattoo on Aida left shoulder: The only reason that comes to my mind is that she lost a bet and the tatoo was the prize she had to pay Anyway is one of the ugliest I' ve ever seen 
|
|
|
|
|
Aida Sorry, but the tattoo is ugly and terrible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
