| Autor | Beiträge |
|---|---|
|
|
malmaisons wrote:so thanks a lot to the 'unknown' spender of the wet t-shirt trilogy +1 Very nice Reserved indeed! Many creds for whoever created this show! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just to mention it: today Cassie did 2 shower shows:
one (premium) with Jasmine and the other (reserved ex) with Molly. The first was nice to watch but pretty much déjà-vu, lasted 15 minutes and viewers got charged - the second was smoking hot (although the girls were not totally unleashed), lasted 30 minutes and was free of charge - so thanks a lot to the 'unknown' spender of the wet t-shirt trilogy by the way: no wonder Cassie got a persistent cough: 2 showers within 2 hours and wet hair and wet shirt when she did the 'pantyhose exclusive' afterwards ... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreamlander wrote:Every day since the new discount rates for the DPS the 'News' section of ETV's site has posted two conflicting discount rate lists one after the other. As I read it, your suspicions are correct |
|
|
|
|
|
Every day since the new discount rates for the DPS the 'News' section of ETV's site has posted two conflicting discount rate lists one after the other.
2 or 3 shows – 2 credits 4 or 5 shows – 3 credits 6 or 7 shows – 4 credits 8 or 9 shows – 5 credits 10 - 12 shows – 6 credits and 3 or 4 videos – 3 credits 5 or 6 videos – 4 credits 7 or 8 videos – 5 credits 9 - 12 videos – 6 credits I can see my credits are being refunded the next day but I don't pay enough attention as to which list they may be using. I wonder if they do? I figured maybe one was for watching live shows, on the day, and the other was watching archive videos the next, or on future, days? Then I thought, that can't be correct as archive shows are usually cheaper than live shows. If their advert is right, then watching 5 live shows costs 3 credits and watching 5 archive shows costs 4 credits? I'm sure it's just an oversight. I'd still like to know though. I may send a 'never to be replied to' email later, I might just be that one-in-a-million customer today, I feel lucky!  Dreamlander |
|
|
|
|
|
Lauren & Schalotte (or better Miss Michelin?
 )or Pat & Patachon or Laurel & Hardy or what is ETV trying with that combination? At least a strange combination and not erotic at all. So no buy from me.  
|
|
|
|
|
Kat and Jasmine are the last show girls that ETV should built its future pillars.
These two girls are improving well, getting further steps forward on the Premium Shows. As I said before, the girls are doing stunning things on the web rather than in the night shows But if these duo young and others beautiful girls are opted for soft show, what the hell are remaining now? The old unpleasant and their affiliations.That's it. Tears are words that need to be written in this forum in absence of real erotic shows. JohnGuitar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
brokingbull wrote:Slowfox wrote:brokingbull wrote:Today's theme: Ah, gotcha From a political pov you are certainly right, but I believe this is miles away from being a political statement. Still it is supposed to be a show not related to any of the present areas of crisis. What I see is, that even in hard times (war) love is possible, or is even the cure. Rather believe this to be the message, but only in case there is a political motivation behind this. But then, as said above, I doubt |
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:brokingbull wrote:Today's theme: Well, strange theme for an erotic channel. Don't they have better ideas? I have enough of wars in these days, ISIS, Gaza and Ucraine. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post: #7438 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 10.08.2014, 22:21 10.08.2014, 21:53 Re: Eurotic's website & webstreambrokingbull wrote:Today's theme: ... and ? I may want to agree, but I do not understand what this is good for. All I see is a correct repeat of the title of the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
Today's theme:
Kiara, Kristina and Lauren Love in the time of war
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilsonsand wrote:From Etv site: Wilsonsand wrote:Wednesday 13th: 2+2=? |
|
|
|
|
White had a good show lots of good camera of her, Nancy had a quiet show. Im glad Cassie is on dps but I wont be watching , the show needs a model with a powerful pair of eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slowfox wrote:I see a lot of praise and expectations upfront. I feel some complaints coming ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see a lot of praise and expectations upfront.
Can hardly wait to read the coments after the show(s). |
|
|
