Autor | Beiträge |
---|---|
uk334 wrote:I am one of those that did watch it and was obsessed, everyday checking here to see who is on I have the same situation - my fascination of this forum (and etv) started about 2 years ago, but a few months ago I perceived only routine, no one can surprise me here. I assume every user has his own crisis D: |
|
|
|
I am one of those that did watch it and was obsessed, everyday checking here to see who is on
Now I never watch it and call here very rarely but still read the same old sh*t from those who do not like it but watch it and those who defend it entirely. Sadly the forum is more about his opinion and never facts but based on handbag throwing Do not like what you see, do not feckin watch it it is simple Have a nice weekend, switch the sh*t off and go and get some fresh air |
|
|
|
space6969 wrote:Where did he write that he doesn't watch shows at all or that he didn't watch last night ? Can't find it. well, no idea where or how you've been searching but only 5 posts before he wrote [Versteckter Link - Registrierung notwendig]: lucifer70 wrote:Last night I watched, for the first time in many weeks, NS. I stand the show 30 minutes only. that's why I've been wondering about the source of all his knowledge. and yes, of course I know that several guys in this forum know all. ;) and don't like the channel and have stopped watching it a long time ago but spend all their days with it. (rofl) (rofl) (rofl) |
|
|
|
Joker1305 wrote:Well, at least it seems he didn't watch last night. As ETV bashing is popular at the moment you don't need to watch to write something negative that sounds plausible to others who haven't watched more than a few minutes either. Where did he write that he doesn't watch shows at all or that he didn't watch last night ? Can't find it. Your post is based on speculation. You could try to accept that not everyone shares your opinions all the time. Telling board members what to write or not to write will get you nowhere. I watched the first "premium" show of the new concept and in my opinion it sucked. Not because I didn't like the cast...but because it wasn't anything new, just the same old character dance pantomime theater crap. And I'm watching tonight (oil show) and imo it's better....girls moving in an erotic way, touching, squeezing, dripping oil and water, very nice. Much, much better, except for the still occuring pixelation. Regarding the night shows I don't see much difference this week compared to some weeks or months ago. Overall boring. To enhance the night shows imo they'd have bring back the good old times, which will propably never happen except maybe they're deparate verging on bancrupcy. |
|
|
|
Post: #10707 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 27.06.2013, 22:10 27.06.2013, 21:44 Re: Eurotic TV - General DiscussionJoker1305 wrote: and it's a bit unpredictable how much you will see of your favorite in the webshow. Exactly my reason for not purchasing any of these shows.I don't watch for the theme,story or any new idea,I watch for the girl,the rest is a bonus as I will always be interested in whatever one of my favourite girls is doing.As long as she is in the Premium show when I pay to watch it,not on the phone in the TV studio while I wait. Dreamlander-Smoking too now! Thank god I didn't finance another cancer show! |
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:Well, at least it seems he didn't watch last night. As ETV bashing is popular at the moment you don't need to watch to write something negative that sounds plausible to others who haven't watched more than a few minutes either.lucifer70 wrote:.... Even if many of the girls last night weren't everyones taste you can't blame them for doing a lame show or lack of motivation, and even the camera and cuts were not bad. Besides all polemic after the first show in the new format (which was a bit clumsy, but IMHO in total not worse or better than Sunday night) it hasn't changed very much for the FTA shows until now. The web show girls were mostly in the Premium studio, the night show girls in the FTA studio, and there was no real surprise . Anyway I'm questioning myself if this format is really a smart idea as webshow customers won't send SMS or call the girls in the FTA show and the other way round, and it's a bit unpredictable how much you will see of your favorite in the webshow. So not sure everyone will spend the credits like for a dedicated webshow of his favorite(s). Time will tell. Regards Joker |
|
|
|
Tarl_Cabot wrote:I also think that the girls don't have a second job as nun at the Samaritians.....lucifer70 wrote:It isn't a coincidence. It's the result of bad choices and a cast of very poor quality and character (not to mention the bad direction, as usual). |
|
|
|
bellerophon wrote:It may be coincidence, but the number of VIP sms received since the reorganisation, compared with the average for the three individual days so far, is down between 15% and 40%. Only Alice has bucked the trend - because of the novelty factor, no doubt. Beller, maybe a coincidence, or maybe something else. For example: during the first years I loved this channel because of the "natural girls" and their intriguing shows. Now: no more intriguing shows and no more "natural girls". I've never been a fan of fake boobs or lips, but I think that it's better to have something fake "outside" rather than "inside". This channel is completely manipulated: there's nothing "natural" anymore . |
|
|
|
lucifer70 wrote:It isn't a coincidence. It's the result of bad choices and a cast of very poor quality and character (not to mention the bad direction, as usual). ok. you don't watch the shows but you know the (bad (of course)) quality and direction. so far I've learnt (learnt, neither understood nor accepted ;)) it in the last years. but now you know the character of the models, too???? |
|
|
|
bellerophon wrote:It may be coincidence, but the number of VIP sms received since the reorganisation compared with the average for the three individual days so far is down between 15% and 40%. Only Alice has bucked the trend - because of the novelty factor, no doubt. It isn't a coincidence. It's the result of bad choices and a cast of very poor quality and character (not to mention the bad direction, as usual). The models themselves don't believe in what they do, and it is clear. Which show could come out of this weird equation? Regards |
|
|
|
Too much persistent publicity, in molvanians, only means fewer customers.....
|
|
|
|
The tv-studio is more and more the waiting hall of the web-studio.
|
|
|
|
Finally etv changed it's policy for night shows and this week we can see some attractive girl's the same Alice, Tara, Ava ... in the night schedule. ...
|
|
|
|
lazaridis wrote:lucifer70 wrote:Molvanians say: Next week (18.06 - 22.06), there will be no director! The Models will direct themselves, according to their desire You forget the camera crew ,we will see more of the ceiling than erotic shots. it like the tail wagging the dog at ETV. the models tell the camera man what to see. |
|
|
|
lucifer70 wrote:Molvanians say: Next week (18.06 - 22.06), there will be no director! The Models will direct themselves, according to their desire If this serious ? If Angelina would be scheduled next week, then our eyes would burn seriously |
|
|