Polysyllabism >> The state of being polysyllabic >> being long and ponderous. Well now we have got that crap out of the way we can turn to the real burning issues of this week.
Some wise old toad or Swot to keep this short and to the point , can't think of his name right now, said only the other day "It's live so anything can happen". And once again it did happen. We never did get to understand why the chicken crossed the studio floor but now we begin to wonder why the clown ran away from the circus and found himself rumbling in the jungle. This Swot picked up on this a bit late so is unaware if there was indeed even a passable explanation for such indulgences.
I have a theory that it was nothing more than a clever ruse to beat the ban on daytime nudity by getting a real tit to dress up as a clown and do some pathetic tricks which impressed those present so much that they removed their shirts, flashed their heaving busoms held tightly in their under-sized day-time bras, which shocked the clown so much that he was never seen again. But in the absence of any plausable explanation, and the danger of become even more polysyllabic, feel free to offer your own in the spaces generously provided below.
Part Two. Which is now offered immediatly rather than by a separate example of polysyllabism since Part Three, which .....(yeah you know this bit by now)......, would get it's leg over Part Two and you have already forgotten Part One let alone Part Two
One of those people foolish enough to cyber-chat with me said a day or so ago "Hey, you are a bit of a swot when it comes to this tv. Can you explain to me the motivation behind the robot ?" For once, this swot was lost for words. Even after a crap - that is 'considerably refreshing alcoholic produce' (whatever did you think I meant) - or three, I am little the wiser.
Ok. Just a few thoughts. This is not really a robot in the mechanical sense. The proper term is Android. But they probably could not spell that as we well know the problems they have with the girls' names and even the other night when someone thought it cool to write out the instructions of how one could control the 'robot' but wrote them in a language, as I am led to understand by another foolish enough to cyber-chat with me, that barely resembled the German that was intended, so five letters would be easier than seven (try saying all that without a pause for breath)
The accusation is that the girl lucky enough to draw the short straw and be 'roboter-vom-tag' is being exploited or ridiculed. Actually, the opposite is the case and it is those foolish enough to dial that number in the hope thay can get something which they should get anyway from a regular model that are being exploited. But the tv relies on this as without willing victims there would be no service. Something that those who simply look in for free and essentially complain the most will never understand. Another of the swot's quotes, which does tend to be repeated quite often fits right here - . "Never underestimate this tv". It is their strength or percieved weakness, whatever your point of view, that they do evolve and conjure up new sources of revenue. And that really is MAGIC !!
And on to Part Three, which was never intended to be Part Three But when you wake up on a wet Sunday morning after viewing what should be the highlight of the week - the Saturday nightshow - words often just flow off this 'pen'.
Do not get me wrong. Mashiara was nice. Scarlet was nice. Inez was nice. Randa was nice. Gia was .....err um... Gia. But there exists a disease in the channel which even after all this time they simply have not cured. If you have to play around with the studio lighting make sure that a) the cameras are able to cope with it and b) the encoding equipment can cope with it. Neither is the case as else one would not have 6 hours of girls with reddish skin (compare that with how they look this morning) or a sea of pixellation which renders any effect useless.
So I must ask. Was it the clowns behind the camera ?. Was it the robots (mechanical ones this time) handling the broadcast ? Or was it just Hans' polysyllabism ? Or am I just being a little unkind ?
