Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

4.86 (7 Bewertung(en))

(4.86 / 5, 7 Bewertungen)

Autor Beiträge

25.10.2016, 22:32

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Cameraman idiot alert !!! AngryThumb down





A great girl in nightshows produced by amateurs, shame Sad

19.10.2016, 10:57

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Not only do babestation do fuck all to appease its customers, they seem to go out of their way to antagonise them. What were once crap sets, are now even crappier. Picture quality is bad with no attempt to make it better. Complaints about pervecam go ignored because in the short term it may be making money for them. But hey! To the detriment of everything else, is that the right way to do things?

The girls have to take their share of blame for this situation. They go along with everything that is suggested to them from behind the camera. Girls that have gladly taken everything given to them by the viewers, are now quite happy to give self preservation shows that please their masters and keep their jobs.

But we all know that these programme makers are only here for the short term. So if they are making money out of serving up this shit then why should they bother about quality.

So as long as the wankers keep wanking they will quite happily treat them like something stuck on the bottom of their shoes.

Before I go, one last question to the owners of these channels. You are obviously making money right now, so why not get everyone on your side and make more of what you hold so precious by making the shows better? You money grubbing cretinous cunts.

19.10.2016, 01:37

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Rallkin123 wrote:I would keep Lola on Studio 66.

Yes this is agreeable. Thumb up I wished her to go to babe station but I do not know if this is a good idea.

Tonight it is the return of Danni Levy; this is my favorite for tonight.

19.10.2016, 01:20

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I tell you what Scottishbloke, if there was a petition to oust all the crap on Babestation and Studio 66 I would welcome it and my name would definitely go on the petition to remove most of the girls on both stations keeping only Olivia, Amanda and Sophie and I would keep Lola on Studio 66.

19.10.2016, 01:04

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I know what you mean mate. its not like Babestation has got any serious competition tonight from S66 as Ella Jolie and Hannah Martin (who is a fucking arrogant diva BTW) Thumb down as they always produce shit shows, in saying that why should any other channel give 2 fucks about what the other one is doing, haven't they got any fucking pride or backbone anymore. So far tonight on Babestation its been a bloody shameful show from them Thumb down

19.10.2016, 00:03

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I just hope and pray Amanda puts on the show of her life tonight, Scottishbloke with hopefully a few pussy slips, but I'm not hopeful. Studio 66 have the boring and dull Hannah Martin and equally dull Ella jolie on tonight----YawnThumb down

18.10.2016, 23:15

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Well Rallkin123 out of all the babes on tonight the only one that might and I say might with a heavy heart is Amanda Rendal might be worth a watch. Lori is back on but last night her sessions were fucking atrocious, all we seen from her was head and shoulders with a wee bit of boob action from time to time. I am so fucking angry at everyone associated with this once great channel for dragging its previous reputation through the mud Angry

If tonight is anything like last night I may aswell say it now - Fuck you Babestation!

18.10.2016, 22:47

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Yeah, Scottishbloke Babestation utter tripe last night and Maddie who used to give a really horny show is now so boring and uninspiring. For pete's sake babestation bosses, PLEASE bring some babes who want to give us viewers A great naked sexy show and get rid of most of the crap we have at the momentThumb down

18.10.2016, 19:57

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Ah well if last night I was already tired after work, switching on Babestation just about knocked me out in the same manner in which an anaesthetic would. I had to find something more stimulating to watch such as the 24 hour knitting channel. These 1 position sessions are a fucking insult, I had a look through all the 900's and I had to ask myself just who the fuck is getting off to this Thumb down

Babestation was atrocious as was its rivals S66. As Lutonbloke says just what has happened to Madison, once a fantastic performer, now just a major disappointment, next time she is on, you might want to hit pause on your remote control and use your imagination that she has somehow gone back to her old school sessions Sad

18.10.2016, 03:44

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

I agree with you about Maddie, Lutonbloke. Her shows are crap these days and she's always bent on wearing those blasted stockings all the time and posing in the most boring
positions all the timeThumb down

18.10.2016, 03:34

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

What has happened to Madison Rose? her shows are now as bad as Ella Jolie and Lucy Zara, she is still a lovely girl with a nice curvy body but she really looks like she doesn't give a shit anymore

17.10.2016, 11:00

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Who remembers a certain shopping channel, (now defunct). The channel that had the very desireable Sarah Hendy as a presenter, that lady was sexy, she wore the shortest of skirts, that covered very little. She smiled a lot. And made cocks stand to attention.
I know it's got fuck all to do with babechannels, but I miss seeing sexy girls on our screen, even though babes are naked, they are not sexy. Far from it. They are just a commodity of a stereotypical idea of sexy. But in reality they are just the opposite. They are boring and bland. If not all, a vast majority of them are.

17.10.2016, 02:47

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

AniseedBalls wrote:It would come as no surprise to me if I was to find out that sexual favours was a normal procedure on these shows. There seems to be a group of girls that no matter how poor they are at presenting a show keep their place in the line up. The reason Ive come up with this conclusion is, younger, much prettier girls, who are much better than the established girls come along and do a fresh, more sexy show. But after a short time they are gone.

Maybe the casting couch plays a part in the selection of girls, because let's face it this is supposed to be a job where glamour is the main criteria. But is it? The amount of pretty girls that have come and gone is a scandal. Leaving us with older less attractive models. I wonder why?

I suppose all I'm saying is that the decision makers should stop thinking with their cocks and start giving the viewing public a show worth watching.

Of course it's only my opinion that sexual favours or handed out, please don't think this is a fact. But also you have to wonder how some of these girls are still here after years doing the same thing.

A lot of the established girls on Babestation are still quite young even though it feels like they have been around forever, i still find a few of the girls on Babestation attractive but i would like to see some new faces, however i don't think that many glamour models want to to nightshows these days, a lot of the best looking new girls are daybabes but they hate freeloaders so won't get their tits out

16.10.2016, 15:32

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

AniseedBalls, I'm of the same opinion as you regarding the casting couch scenario. Though it can't be proved, nevertheless I'm convinced it goes on and I have heard of the odd apocryphal story.

16.10.2016, 11:22

Re: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

It would come as no surprise to me if I was to find out that sexual favours was a normal procedure on these shows. There seems to be a group of girls that no matter how poor they are at presenting a show keep their place in the line up. The reason Ive come up with this conclusion is, younger, much prettier girls, who are much better than the established girls come along and do a fresh, more sexy show. But after a short time they are gone.

Maybe the casting couch plays a part in the selection of girls, because let's face it this is supposed to be a job where glamour is the main criteria. But is it? The amount of pretty girls that have come and gone is a scandal. Leaving us with older less attractive models. I wonder why?

I suppose all I'm saying is that the decision makers should stop thinking with their cocks and start giving the viewing public a show worth watching.

Of course it's only my opinion that sexual favours or handed out, please don't think this is a fact. But also you have to wonder how some of these girls are still here after years doing the same thing.